1999 Buick Regal vs. 1972 Toyota Carina

To start off, 1999 Buick Regal is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Toyota Carina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Toyota Carina would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1972 Toyota Carina. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1972 Toyota Carina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Buick Regal weights approximately 610 kg more than 1972 Toyota Carina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Toyota Carina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Toyota Carina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Buick Regal (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Toyota Carina. (134 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1999 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Toyota Carina.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Buick Regal 1972 Toyota Carina
Make Buick Toyota
Model Regal Carina
Year Released 1999 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 85.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 70 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 950 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2430 mm