1999 Buick Regal vs. 1992 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1999 Buick Regal is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.

Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Buick Regal (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1999 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang. 1999 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Buick Regal 1992 Ford Mustang
Make Buick Ford
Model Regal Mustang
Year Released 1999 1992
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 2302 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2560 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]