1999 Buick Regal vs. 2003 Mazda 3

To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Buick Regal weights approximately 300 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Buick Regal (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3. 1999 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Buick Regal 2003 Mazda 3
Make Buick Mazda
Model Regal 3
Year Released 1999 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 311 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 83.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1260 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 55 L