1999 Buick Regal vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Buick Regal would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1999 Buick Regal. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1999 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 744 kg more than 1999 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Buick Regal. (380 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Buick Regal.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Buick Regal 2013 Toyota Tundra
Make Buick Toyota
Model Regal Tundra
Year Released 1999 2013
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 245 HP 376 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 380 Nm 544 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 2304 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 5329 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1935 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 3220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 100 L