1999 Buick Riviera vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1999 Buick Riviera is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Buick Riviera (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Buick Riviera should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Buick Riviera weights approximately 590 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Buick Riviera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Buick Riviera | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Buick | DKW |
| Model | Riviera | Munga |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
