1999 Cadillac Catera vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1999 Cadillac Catera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 1999 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Cadillac Catera. (370 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Cadillac Catera.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Cadillac Catera | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Catera | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |