1999 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1999 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 475 kg more than 1999 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Cadillac DeVille | 1963 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | DeVille | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 5670 mm |
