1999 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200
To start off, 1999 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. (108 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 355 kg more than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Cadillac DeVille | 1980 Mercedes-Benz 200 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | DeVille | 200 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
