1999 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 410 kg more than 2003 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1640 mm |
