1999 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 225 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Mustang |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1860 mm |