1999 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 248 kg more than 1999 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | DeVille | XF |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5330 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1877 mm |
