1999 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Cadillac Eldorado has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Cadillac Eldorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Cadillac Eldorado | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Eldorado | 12 M |
Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2500 mm |