1999 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Ford 427
To start off, 2003 Ford 427 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Ford 427 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford 427 (582 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1999 Cadillac Eldorado. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford 427 should accelerate faster than 1999 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 2003 Ford 427 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford 427. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford 427 (704 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Cadillac Eldorado. (407 Nm). This means 2003 Ford 427 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Cadillac Eldorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 Ford 427 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Eldorado | 427 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 6997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 582 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 704 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
