1999 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Astro | Epica |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |