1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 995 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Camaro | 16 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 238 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2260 mm |
