1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 301 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 970 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Camaro | 600 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 19 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |