1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1960 Ferrari 256 F1
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 853 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Camaro | 256 F1 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 159 L |