1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 660 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Cedric |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |