1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Ford GT 40

To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 686 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Chevrolet Camaro 1964 Ford GT 40
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Camaro GT 40
Year Released 1999 1964
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 5665 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 317 HP 350 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 7200 RPM
Torque 468 Nm 85 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 864 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4030 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1040 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2420 mm