1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 Mazda Familia
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1966 Mazda Familia. (35 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 810 kg more than 1966 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mazda Familia. (60 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 Mazda Familia | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | Familia |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 782 cc |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |
