1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1971 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 480 kg more than 1971 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1971 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Camaro | 160 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |