1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1973 Mazda 616
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 635 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1973 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | 616 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2480 mm |
