1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1979 Seat 133
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 133 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 286 more horse power than 1979 Seat 133. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 855 kg more than 1979 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat 133. (55 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1979 Seat 133 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Camaro | 133 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 55 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2030 mm |