1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 780 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Camaro | 102 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2160 mm |
