1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, both 1999 Chevrolet Camaro and 1999 Holden Maloo were released in the same year (1999). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. (468 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Camaro | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
