1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2490 mm |