1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Ford Laser
To start off, 2003 Ford Laser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (320 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2003 Ford Laser. (105 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 430 kg more than 2003 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Laser. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Laser. 2003 Ford Laser has automatic transmission and 1999 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Laser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Ford Laser | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Laser |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 81.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |