1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mazda 2

To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 328 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Chevrolet Camaro 2003 Mazda 2
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 2
Year Released 1999 2003
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3390 cc 1397 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 73.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 50 L