1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 172 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 9000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 2288 cc |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |