1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Subaru Traviq
To start off, 2005 Subaru Traviq is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2005 Subaru Traviq. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Subaru Traviq. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 74 kg more than 2005 Subaru Traviq. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Subaru Traviq. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Subaru Traviq.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Subaru Traviq | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Camaro | Traviq |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 468 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |