1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 470 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2550 mm |