1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 92 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Camaro | Countryman |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 468 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 47 L |