1999 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 338 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cavalier | 323 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2370 mm |