1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 164 weights approximately 173 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1972 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 164. (241 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Impala | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Impala | 164 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 241 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 60 L |