1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1981 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 62 kg more than 1981 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1981 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1981 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1981 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Impala | 1981 Simca 2 Litres | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
| Model | Impala | 2 Litres |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |
