1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 123 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Impala | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Impala | 240 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2660 mm |
