1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1983 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,689 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 2148 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1983 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. (305 Nm). This means 1983 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Impala | 1983 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Chevrolet | ZIL |
Model | Impala | 4104 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 7689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 608 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 3335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3340 mm |