1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 83 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1990 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Impala | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Impala | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1999 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1910 mm |