1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Compass weights approximately 219 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. (305 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Impala | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Impala | Compass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2660 mm |
