1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 791 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (319 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. (305 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Impala | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Impala | Commander |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1978 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 80 L |
