1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 15 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda CR-Z. 1999 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2011 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2011 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Impala | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Impala | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 173 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 40 L |