1999 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 688 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (625 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Impala. (305 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Impala | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Impala | XF |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 625 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2909 mm |