1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60

To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 244 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.

Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1946 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1946 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: