1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1961 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 376 kg more than 1961 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1961 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (203 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (146 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Jeep CJ5. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1961 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1961 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 1961 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Malibu | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 146 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2060 mm |