1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 174 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1963 Rover 2000 has manual transmission. 1963 Rover 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Malibu | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 54 L |