1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1965 Mitsubishi 500
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 876 kg more than 1965 Mitsubishi 500.
Because 1965 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (203 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 1965 Mitsubishi 500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Malibu | 500 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 593 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2070 mm |
