1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 179 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 6550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2960 mm |