1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 159 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Malibu | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |