1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 767 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (360 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. (203 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Malibu | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 2173 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5207 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3020 mm |
