1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Malibu | Pixo |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2360 mm |